1. Call to Order by Chair

    Mr. Ken Bukowski called the meeting to order at 9:07 am.

  2. Roll Call

    Ken Bukowski – Chair, Deputy City Administrator/CFO, City Administrator 
    Bella Fudym – IT Project Director, Adult Probation 
    Ian Law – CIO, Airport 
    Gigi Whitley – Deputy Director, Administration and Finance, Assessor-Recorder 
    Brian Strong – Director, Capital Planning 
    Jaci Fong – Director and Purchaser, Contract Administration 
    Todd Rydstrom – Deputy Controller, Controller’s Office 
    William Lee – CFO, Emergency Management 
    Brent Lewis – CFO, Human Resources 
    Marisa Pereira Tully – Analyst, Mayor’s Office 
    Travis Fox – Deputy Director Technology & Performance/CIO, MTA 
    Bill Kim – CIO, Public Health 
    Michael Liang –CIO, Public Library 
    Julia Dawson – Deputy Director, Public Works 
    Bryant Bailess –Director, Project Management Office, Technology 
    Chanda Ikeda – Director, COIT 

    Members Present 
    Ken Bukowski 
    Bella Fudym 
    Ian Law 
    Gigi Whitley 
    Brian Strong 
    Todd Rydstrom 
    William Lee 
    Brent Lewis 
    Marisa Pereira Tully 
    Travis Fox 
    Bill Kim 
    Michael Liang 
    Julia Dawson 
    Bryant Bailess 
    Chanda Ikeda 

    Member Absent
    Jaci Fong 

    COIT Staff
    Lily Liang 
    Matthias Jaime 

    Guests
    Mike Dearman 
    Joseph John 
    Ron Vinson 
    Allegra Fortunati 
    Michelle Geddes 
    John Robson 
    Brian Roberts 
    Bill Storty 
    Miguel Gamino 
    Mike Valencia 
    Jagan Deb 
    Chris Chamerlain 
    Herman Brown 
    Elaine Benvenuti 
    Fan-Wa Wong 
    Tim Conway 
    Skip Niesen 
    Kathy Lu 
    Tom DiSanto 
    Eric Vintero 

  3. Approval of Minutes

    The minutes of February 20, 2015 were approved.

  4. Discussion: FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17 Project Recommendations

    Ms. Chanda Ikeda provided the Subcommittee with an overview of funding projections, previously approved projects, and remaining funds in COIT’s Annual Projects Allocation and Major IT Projects Allocation over the next two fiscal years. 

    Ms. Ikeda then discussed details of the review process for new project requests, including staff assessment, scoring criteria, performance analysis, other considerations, and the Subcommittee’s upcoming project request presentation schedule. 

    A general discussion followed in which Subcommittee members considered additional financial information and analysis that could be shared in future review sessions. 

  5. Discussion: FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17 Project Requests

    1. Major IT Project: Financial Systems Replacement Project (CON) 
    2. Major IT Project: Public Safety & Public Service Radio Replacement Project (DEM) 
    3. Department of Technology Requests:

            • Fiber Connectivity & Wi-Fi & Dig Once Projects 
            • Fix the Network 
            • Data Center & DR Migration to the Cloud 
            • Security 
            • Identity & Access Management 
            • City Authentication Consolidation 
            • Configuration Management Database 
            • Radio Site Security Enhancement 
            • IT Service Management Implementation 

    Major IT Project: Financial Systems Replacement Project (CON) 
    Mr. Mike Dearman, Financial Systems Replacement Project Manager, presented an overview of the project’s objectives, scope, schedule, budget, and key milestones. Notably, he reported that a contract had recently been awarded and that negotiations were underway. 

    General discussions followed regarding the impact on City departments, change management, training, business process reengineering and realignment, staffing, and consultant support. 

    In response to questions regarding the project’s budget, Mr. Dearman noted that revised figures would be provided following finalization of the project contract in the coming months. 

    Major IT Project: Public Safety & Public Service Radio Replacement Project (DEM) 
    Ms. Michelle Geddes presented on the project’s objectives, scope, schedule, budget, recent and ongoing efforts, and key milestones. Most notably, she reported a change in scope since DEM’s last presentation to include public service radios, a change that has resulted in an increase to the project’s budget. 

    General discussions followed regarding interdepartmental involvement, use of existing City infrastructure, external stakeholders, and similar projects in other cities. 

    In closing, general consensus was reached regarding the need for clarity around the project’s variety of current and future funding sources. 

    Department of Technology Requests 
    With support from Mr. Miguel Gamiño, Mr. John Robson, Mr. Joseph John, and Mr. Herman Brown, Mr. Bryant Bailess presented the following projects and discussed their respective objectives, scopes, schedules, and budgets. 
            • Fiber Connectivity & Wi-Fi & Dig Once Projects 
            • Fix the Network 
            • Data Center & DR Migration to the Cloud 
            • Security 
            • Identity & Access Management 
            • City Authentication Consolidation 
            • Configuration Management Database 
            • Radio Site Security Enhancement 
            • IT Service Management Implementation 

    General discussions followed several of these presentations regarding the projects’ dependencies on one another as well as their impacts on external agencies. Subsequently, a request was made for a matrix demonstrating project priorities, dependencies, and relative impact. 

    Additionally, the Subcommittee determined that further review would require information detailing projects’ budget uses, costs to external agencies, and divisions between COIT/Capital and General Fund/non-General Fund sources. 

    For more information regarding the projects presented under this agenda item, please visit http://www.sfcoit.org

  6. Public Comment

    There was no public comment.

  7. Adjournment

    The meeting adjourned at 12:14 pm.

Sunshine Ordinance

San Francisco Administrative Code §67.9(a)   Agendas of meetings and any other documents on file with the clerk of the policy body, when intended for distribution to all, or a majority of all, of the members of a policy body in connection with a matter anticipated for discussion or consideration at a public meeting shall be made available to the public. To the extent possible, such documents shall also be made available through the policy body's Internet site. However, this disclosure need not include any material exempt from public disclosure under this ordinance.