Committee on Information Technology - November 16, 2017 - Minutes
COMMITTEE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Thursday, November 16, 2017
10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
City Hall, Room 305
Naomi Kelly, City Administrator, Chair
Linda Gerull, Chief Information Officer, Department of Technology
Melissa Whitehouse, Budget Director, Mayor’s Office
London Breed, President, San Francisco Board of Supervisors
Ben Rosenfield, Controller
Micki Callahan, Director, Department of Human Resources
Barbara Garcia, Director, Department of Public Health
Luis Herrera, City Librarian, Public Library
Harlan L. Kelly, Jr., General Manager, Public Utilities Commission
Anne Kronenberg, Director, Department of Emergency Management
Ivar Satero, Director, San Francisco International Airport
Edward D. Reiskin, Director, Municipal Transportation Agency
Trent Rhorer, Executive Director, Human Services Agency
Charles Belle, Public Member
Alex Polvi, Public Member
1. Call To Order
Ms. Naomi Kelly called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m.
2. Roll Call
Kelly Kirkpatrick (for Melissa Whitehouse)
Kayleigh Lloyd (for London Breed)
Bill Kim (for Barbara Garcia)
Ken Salmon (for Harlan Kelly)
Mitch Sutton (for Anne Kronenberg)
Lisa Walton (for Ed Reiskin)
Dan Kalamaras (for Trent Rhorer)
3. Approval of Meeting Minutes from October 27, 2017 (Action Item)
The minutes of October 27, 2017 were approved.
4. Chair Update
Ms. Kelly provided an overview of the agenda and context for the proposed action items.
5. CIO Update
Ms. Linda Gerull remarked on the development of Continuity of Operations Plans (COOPs) across the City, opportunities with the Startup in Residence (STIR) Program, progress made on the City’s broadband initiative, and the latest on Office 365 migrations.
6. COIT Policy Update: Review and Removal of Existing COIT Policies (Action Item)
Mr. Matthias Jaime discussed the intent of City-wide IT policies previously adopted by the Committee and shared a summary of policies being considered for revision or removal. In particular, he noted that following several discussions, the CIO and working group proposed that the Fiber-Optic Access Management Policy and “Virtual First” Server Procurement Policy be sunset as both policies are no longer relevant to current processes or technology.
A motion to sunset the Fiber-Optic Access Management Policy and the “Virtual First” Server Procurement Policy was passed and approved.
7. Policy Update: Disaster Preparedness, Recovery, Response, and Resiliency (DPR3)
Mr. Bijan Karimi shared an overview of the DPR3 policy, its purpose, background, and steering committee partners tasked with supporting its implementation (Emergency Management, Controller’s Office, Department of Technology, COIT). Mr. Karimi then shared a general timeline for implementation, including key goals and milestones.
Ms. Kamroonbanu Mohideenbasha then discussed the Department of Technology’s role in supporting implementation, including the development and distribution of COOP forms and templates, followed by an overview of recommended drills and exercises departments should perform on a regular basis.
8. Initiative Update: Hiring Modernization
Ms. Micki Callahan introduced this item and discussed the impetus for pursuing hiring modernization, which she noted is part technology project and part process re-engineering focused on improving the overall user experience for applicants, hiring managers, and human resources staff tasked with using and navigating JobAps, the City’s applicant tracking system. Most notably, Ms. Callahan stated that the contract for JobAps is expiring and changes to some Civil Service rules are in the process of being proposed and will be heard in public hearings soon.
Mr. David Huebner then delved into greater detail regarding replacement of JobAps, including process mapping, outreach efforts, collection and analysis of user feedback, prototyping/testing of process/building block changes, and potential use of modular procurement.
A general discussion followed in which members voiced their support for the initiative and offered suggestions for potential process changes and improvements.
9. Public Comment
There was no public comment.
The meeting adjourned at 11:08 a.m.